Sunday, March 31, 2019

General Motors Corporation Change Management Business Essay

frequent Motors Corporation intensify Management Business Essay range of transfigureThe ever lasting truth of the universe is miscellanea. People, institutions, markets flip each second. This flip-flop is stimulated by the environment. On idiosyncratic level peck manage variety by changing on that point routines and habits, which is relatively unsub secernated. swap in an placement is complex but fol number ones the same rules, memorial tablets like an respective(prenominal) know to qualify there habits and routines.The organizations who nourish failed to cope with the assortment absorb crumbled under the feet of cadence either disappearing or universe acquired by b be-assed(prenominal) companies. For example lurchbird, tucker flowerpot, wirgin, tohatsu, clover, British satellite broadcasting, world protagonist wrestling, archandor, and most recently general which filled chapter 11 unsuccessful person. These organizations were un up to(p) to select the swop in the environment and were rejected by the environment.The organizations that fuck off been proactive and managed change have been success stories .i.e. Microsoft, 3com and us robotics, Cadbury and Kraft etc. these organizations have changed there strategies at the right time, they were the leaders of market change.Introduction to familiar Motors full general Motors Corporation (GM) is the worlds largest full-line vehicle manufacturer and marketer. Its arsenal of brands includes Chevrolet, Pontiac, GMC, Buick, Cadillac, Sa exercise, Hummer, and Saab. Opel, Vauxhall(a), and Holden comprise GMs transnational nameplates. Through its system of global alliances, GM holds stakes in Isuzu Motors Ltd., fuji Heavy Industries Ltd., Suzuki Motor Corporation, Fiat Auto, and GM Daewoo Auto Technology. Other hint business sectores include global Motors Acceptance Corporation and its subsidiaries, providers of financing and insurance to GM customers and dealers. In the early 2000s, struggling under the weight of escalating healthc be and support costs, GM sought to shed some of its less profitable activities. Toward that end, among other(a)wise moves, the company sold its stake in Hughes Electronics, phased out production of the Oldsmobile, and s wind the Chevrolet Camero and Pontiac Firebird. Facing a tough economic climate, GM has nevertheless main(prenominal)tained its position as the worlds leading automaker.Models of change prudenceNow companies have realized the compulsion for change and change management. That is the reason many a(prenominal) scholars came up with different mannikins of change management.There are some simple flummoxs of change and then there are some complex role models. simple models are admirerful but do not chance on the adopts of real economySimple models which follow the approach that one size fits allLewins modelUnfreeze the current paradigm of the organization. This involves understanding the need for change. b eca drill communicating that need to the people. People should be open to change in structure, behavior and thinking.Change the organization paradigm by introducing new theories in the organization. This is a lengthy forge as the new method entrust take time to sink in. people impart question the new method thus it is important that there is a strong duct for feedback.Refreeze the changed paradigm. This is the stage where the change is inculcated into the organization and people followed the changed methods as a pct and parcel of the organization.Kotters 8 stepscreating a vibe of change into the members store up supporters to guide changecreate a quite a littleexplain the vision to the supportersempower people to follow and spread the visioncreate supposition objective or milestonesimprovements and feedbackInculcation of change by making it a give instruction of structure and system.Complex model which recognize the need of individualist organizations.Johnson Scholes and W hittingtons model identifies the variables that the organization faces.Time is how quickly change is needed. This tin be identified by the Balogun and Hailys model.Scope is the degree of change that is undeniable.Continuity what is the additive factorHistory is the past experience of changeSkills what capabilities are postulate and what do we have.Resources which are available for change management.Readiness is the willingness of people to lease change.Power is where the of the organization lies i.e. with management employees, stakeholders etc.McKinsey 7S frame flirt identifies the areas that management need to condense on in order to manage change efficaciouslyStructure is the hierarchy and the departmentalization of the organization before and after the change.Strategy is the plans that organization makes i.e. when to compete? Where to compete? And when to compete?System is the alignment of the strategy with the business objective and at what level evolutionary stage the or ganization stands. shared values is what type of agriculture prevails in the organizationStyle is the lead style of the management. How are decisions made?Staff is the human resource of the organization. How instruct they are and what staff is needed?Skill is the organizations ability to use its resources. indeed measure of the efficiency of the organization.Need for strategic change in frequent motorsGeneral motor is a fallen giant. Glory of the past from being a great market leader to bankrupt company General motors has come a prospicient way. In 1980s GM was the top political machine manufacturer in the USA until the arrival of the Japanese cars. The Japanese sold cheap and better cars. GM failed to realize the change in the intentness and technology and agelessly lost market share to the Japanese companies. Even with organization support the company filled chapter 11 bankruptcy in 2009.The strategies of the Japanese and GM can be compared with each other and foil to wh at GM needs to do in order to get its former glory.The strategies that have been used by GM are intelligent discounting to capture or retain market share.Strategic intervention techniquesThe object of intervention techniques is to improve the efficiency and the effectiveness of the organization. Strategic intervention techniques focus on improving the abutes through which humors are sacrificed and then gain feedback on the ideas. These techniques make some thing happen and also focus on what is happening French Bell Jr (1994). The reasons for interventions can beTo gain feedbackTo civilize peopleTo invoke rapid change in the organization.Rapid and choppy change in the external environmentIntense competition private road forces for change in GMDriving forces are the reason that GM requires to change its strategy and align itself with the environment. Few of the forces that pressure Gm to change are as followsLow economic growth in the car manufacturing business has stumped mo st of the manufacturers.Car manufacturers on establishment support are making cars at a loss but yet there cars are in the market and cutting the market share of other companies.Japanese car manufacturers are making better cars at low price which is the main competition for GM.Change in technology in the industry has been an issue. Honda and Toyota have advanced in technology at a higher rate than GM.Rising oil prices have also caused the industry to rethink there strategy.Resource implications for GMGM CEO twist around Wagoner has put in a lot of effort to turn around GM since 1992.but his response to change in the environment was too slow. The resources of GM can be evaluated using 5 Ms modelMoney has been the problem for GM for sometime now but government is ready to help them but they do not have a turn around strategy.Manpower of GM has not been able to generate new ideas which show dulled motivation, and poor creativity skills by the management and other employees. Also GM is stuck in contacts with employees with huge pensions.Minutes time frame for adaptation has always been short for GM and it has always lagged female genital organ the need of time.Material has truly special item oil which has sky rocketed. So the price of car manufacturing is rising as well as the price of maintaining a car.Machinery has been the major issue for GM as its competitors have acquired new machinery and processes which are better than that of GM.Due to these factors GM has not been able to change. These are the forces that create resistance for change.Change and stakeholdersStakeholders are an integral part of the organizational paradigm. To look at change in the organization, stakeholders should own the change. The process of change should start from within the stakeholders.To change the culture stakeholders should realize that there is a need for change. Then they should be directed into the right direction. In Kotters 8 steps model for change the role of stakehold ers can be incorporated. The model pushes the organization to make its own decision and define its process of change.Kotters model for change for GMKotter gives a model of change in the organization in which the stakeholders are empowered to make change for themselves. I shall use this model to explain how GM can bring about change in the organization with the help of its stakeholders. stride 1 Create compulsionFor change to occur it is required the whole organization realizes the need for change and puts its effort in making the change. For this de marginination managers can tonality a grim picture of the future if continued on the same path. develop to the shareholders the increase in ability of the organization to exploit its resources. There should be feed back from the stakeholders and there ideas should be incorporated in the change process.In instance of GM it is not very difficult to paint a grim picture because the next step to bankruptcy is liquidation. The ebb in t he performance of the company has been a question mark for a long time now. So in GM people are ready for change and stakeholders support the management. Now there is need for discussions so that the ideas and the wills of the stakeholders can be incorporated in the change process.Step 2 CoalitionsThis is the point where the leadership e intermixs people among the stakeholder should take charge of the groups. It is necessary that to identify the key leadership and make them commit to the change in the organization. This is necessary that people who are selected for the leadership believe in the change.In case of General Motors they have to find leaders in order to bring change. Recognition of the people who will help GM to evolve and to admit the changed processes is necessary, if it wishes to make any type of change in its strategy.Step 3 Vision for changeWhen the process of change starts there are many idea of floating. All these ideals need to be linked together if in order to f orm a vision. This vision needs to be simple and understandable. The vision gives people a sense of direction they understand the purpose of the change. For change to be successful you need to know the main idea behind the change. For this purpose prepare a summary of the future endeavors of the company. well-read about the future helps people to support the organization.In case of General Motors the explosive charge statement is quite clear G.M. is a multinational corporation engaged in socially responsible operations, worldwide. It is dedicated to provide products and go of such quality that our customers will obtain superior value epoch our employees and business partners will share in our success and our stock-holders will receive a sustained superior return on their investment.But unluckily General Motors has not been able to deliver. The vision of the General Motors needs to be communicated effectively through the organization. both stakeholder needs to believe in the m ission statement of General Motors.Step 4 Communication of visionEvery person in the organization needs to know the objective of the change. The old paradigm of the company will produce resistance against the new method. The newborn Mission statement needs to overcome the resistance and unite the organization on a single path to success. For this the management needs to telephone all the doubts and problems of the people. Divide the vision into smaller objectives and tie the performance of individual with the achievement of these objectives.In General Motors the management should take responsibility of communicating process of change through the organization. A process of change genuine from the input of stakeholders is easier to communicate back.Step 5 Remove obstaclesIn the process of change, there will always be resistance. The objective of the management is to besmirch this resistance and bring the stakeholders to a common platform on which everybody can express their opini on. As the process of change moves forward, there should be constant checks for any barriers to change.In General Motors the inner management has failed to provide change in the organization. The change in GM can be bring on from the outside perhaps a change agent will help GM over come change barriers. Another good way to bring about change is to award the people who embrace the change.Step 6 Create short term objectivesFor the process of change to work people need to know that it is working. For this management can divide the main objective in to simpler objectives. The management should thoroughly analyze the short term objectives such that they are achievable and motivation. For the achievement of every objective the employees should be rewarded.In General Motors that management need to step up and divide their long-term objectives into the short term goals. The management should make the stakeholders believe that they are capable of changing the business for the better. The mo st important stakeholder of GM is the government. The government needs to know that that GM can stand on its feet, for it to unloosen out the company.Step 7 Build on the changeThe process of change is not complete he unless and until the change culture has inculcated into the organization. Changes in many organizations fail because they do not fully implement the changed processes. The changed processes should sour part and parcel of life in the organization. The people of the organization need to build on the changed processes and achieve even more success.The management of General Motors should not stop at making the government believed that they deserve a bailout, but should make efforts to build on the changed processes.Step 8 Change in corporate cultureThe most difficult thing to do in bringing about change into the organization is to change the culture of the organization. In history many of the mergers in companies have failed because they unable to merge the culture of the companies. Changing the culture of the company is a very long and hard process.General motors will need to change the culture and produce a fresh method to succeed in an unattractive industry. At this point the employees of General Motor will not be propel the management needs to bring faith back into the employees.Monitoring impart and conclusionThe final step in the management of change would be to monitor the performance of the company. For this purpose appraisal of each of the activities of the company will be performed. The justification of activity will provide grounds by which the productivity of the activity will be measured. The idea of kaizen should become a part of the activities of the business.The process of change is very lengthy it takes years for change process to become part of the culture. The management of the organization needs to be very patient and need to prioritize their objectives.In General Motors it is necessary that people accept the change and once t he changed processes have settled in there should be continuous evaluation and revaluation. The U.S market has become very saturated thus not allowing the companies to grow as fast as they would like. For the companies to survive they need to use there resources with utmost efficiency.

No comments:

Post a Comment